Final Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 2

Final - Essay ExampleUS commission on Civil rights serves as an overall advisor as well as a watchdog and the countrys polished rights division within the de tell apartment of justice bears the responsibility of enforcing non- divergence statutes. Nevertheless, the dispersion of responsibilities in agencies with different agendas affected the service of affirmative feat implementation. However, all the agencies were concerned with application of non-discriminating policies to the divers(a) segments of the US economy despite the jump out of various jurisprudence disputes even within their spheres of natural process besides administrative saves were related and affected new(prenominal) spheres. By the turn of the twenty-first century, a small number expressed support for racial unlikeness after the civil rights movement progressed from obscurity during the civil war to mid-twentieth century activism to the current accepted wisdom. The non-controversial part is the reactive pol icy that ensures non- secretion based on race, religion, color, sex and national origin in social, economic and educational affairs. The non-discrimination laws are designed to make sure that individuals are never judged by color of skin, but alternatively by the content of their character and incase a violation occurs, such individuals are entitled to remedies (Lee, 1999). dogmatic and Negative Results of Affirmative Action Legislation Affirmative action seems to have a short account statement though it is a hands-on policy that makes special efforts about employment decisions, entry into college and other ordinary behavior as a means of compensating for past discrimination. Affirmative action bases on the thought that various groups of people even without being discriminated against currently, any individual belonging to such groups are disadvantaged in the workplace and in campuses as a result of the past discrimination aimed at the group. Therefore, affirmative action attemp ts to level the playing ground for all categories of citizens thought it emphasizes on disadvantaged groups as opposed to wound individuals. Affirmative action can refer to a court-ordered, remedial programs designed to correct effects of discrimination documented in court. Proponents of affirmative action hold that affirmative action provides long-term cure for discrimination by offering victims chances to show their skills and worth, which eventually changes prejudicial attitudes. Nevertheless, opponents of this controversial program argue that affirmative action never addresses the cause of inequality and the program can create labor market inefficiencies and result in reverse discrimination. Therefore, both sides suggest that effective affirmative action would cause minority employment to add-on however the sides disagree on whether this raise is efficient and on whether it would be sustainable if affirmative action ended (Lee, 1999). Currently there is small opportunity to mea sure the impact of eradicating affirmative action programs. As Federal, support for enforcement faded and flowed, the Supreme Court ruling in the past decade chipped away at affirmative action making it difficult to confirm whether concurrent changes in minority outcomes are imputable to affirmative actio