Advantages and Disadvantages of Technology Essay Example for Free

Advantages and Disadvantages of engineering EssayTechnology began when man started to control and modify personality to meet his needs. Prior to the 20th Century, engineering science was identified with skilled men and women who passed their expertise and know-how from one generation to an other. Back then engineering science was associated with innovative techniques, new processes and new methods of doing things. With the scientific revolution in the 20th Century, the concept of technology changed. It is now fast associated with gadgets, products and innovative scientific inventions.This essay examines the advantages and disadvantages of two simple technological innovations the stun gun and the police car video surveillance. Their imp figure out, advantages and disadvantages to the society will be evaluated for purpose of deeper appreciation of their use.Advantages and Disadvantages of Stun Guns and Police Car characterization SurveillanceTechnology is closely tied with the concept of innovation. There was a duration when equity enforcement officers employ the wooden batons as their only weapons against tough individuals who resisted arrest (Scott Oldham, 2005, p.1). In view of the lack of effective weapons that they drive out use to apprehend and subdue umbrageouss, encounters between law enforcement officers and suspects often lead to a bloody fight. As a result either the police officer or the suspect ends up getting naughtily hurt or killed.Read moreTechnology Advantages and Disadvantages EssayThere was also a time when law enforcement officers had to rely on their recollection of the events during dangerous situations. They had to record the license number of the suspects getaway vehicle, remember their faces and the anatomy of weapons practice. If they were able to arrest the suspects after a dangerous situation, suspects often filed suits against law enforcement officers alleging brutality and violence they experienced in the hand s of the police officers. There being no other witnesses, the police officer had always been placed in jeopardy of being maliciously sued by a suspect he had arrested in his line of duty.With the use of technology, man was able to control and modify nature for the purpose of satisfying his own needs. Law enforcement officers keep found simple solutions to their everyday problems. With the use of stun guns police officers were able to harness the power of electricity. They were able to control the volt and use it to apprehend violent suspects by incapacitating them temporarily.With the discovery of stun guns, police officers no longer cave in to worry around getting hurt or hurting anybody in the course of the arrest. In case a suspect resists arrest and becomes really violent, the law enforcement officer only has to press this gun against the body of the suspect. It will drop an electronic charge that is high in voltage that send word disable the suspect for 20 to 30minutes to lerable time for them to place handcuff on the suspect.Police officers no longer have to worry most the possibility of them forgetting the suspects face or the license number of the vehicle or the kind of weapon used. He also need not fear that suits for excessive violence and brutality may be filed against him because there is physical evidence that can be presented sooner the court. Law enforcement officers only have to produce the recording of his patrol car video surveillance and present it in court to repel the false and malicious accusations against him.Just like any technology, however, it can be abused. In the hands of an opprobrious law enforcement officer, stun guns may cause full injury against a suspect if not used properly. According to United Nations Committee use of stun guns by the police may cause original pain and in certain cases may lead to death. (David Morgan, 2007, p.2) It has been reported that since 1999, 80 people have died and others have been serio usly injured by police using electronic stun gun which negate the claims that they be non lethal weapons. (Greg Mathis, 2005, p.1)Use of police car video surveillance may be advantageous for some(prenominal) but it may pose a serious constitutional challenge for others. Lawyers have challenged the legality of the act of police officers using their video photographic camera as proof to apprehend those who commit over hie and those who run against red lights. Their contention is that the owners of the car are automatically considered guilty and imposed a punishment even if it may be possible that the car owners were not driving the vehicles at the time the encroachment was committed. Aside from constitutional violation of presumption of innocence, some police officers may use the video camera for the purpose of invading the privacy of private individuals.ConclusionTechnology is indeed the successful attempt by man to control and modify nature for the purpose of satisfying human n eeds and providing solutions to his problem. It may go along that the technology may turn into something that it is intended to do or to something that it is not intended to. This is precisely what technology is. It may turn out beneficial to mankind but it may also pose serious risks for us.In the case of stun guns, I believe it is still one of the most non-lethal instruments that police officers can utilize against suspects. It would be better however if police officers are educated on its use and its dangers before they are allowed to use these instruments. The same thing is true for video surveillance which is most effective if it is apply for strictly law enforcement work. These instruments therefore are not dangerous in themselves. They are not atrocious in themselves. Problem starts when those who utilize it use it improperly. This problem could be remedied by proper orientation and didactics so that old and new law enforcement officers may be advised on how to properly u tilize these new pieces of technology.