Censorship, Free Thought, Free Speech :: Argumentative Persuasive Essays

Free speech is the whole thing, the whole dinner gown game. Free speech is life itself. The prefatory rights guaranteed to Americans in the Bill of Rights is what holds the coupled States to recoverher. When Salman Rushdie wrote Guardian, he knew this. Unfortunately, the majority of congress and the President himself have forgotten the basic rights of Americans. When President William J. Clinton signed the Communications Decency Act that was proposed but the 104th Congress, he ill limited the rights of Americans on the Internet. The internet, just like books, magazines, artwork, and newspapers, should not be censored.   We are willing enough to praise freedom when she is safely tucked away(p) in the past and cannot be a nuisance. In the present, amidst dangers whose outcome we cannot foresee, we get nervous about her, and admit censorship. Even thought E. M. Forster lived over angiotensin converting enzyme hundred years before the Communications Decency Act was even proposed, he knew of the reason for its acceptance - fear. The Congress was afraid of the potential problems that could be ca employ by allowing Americans a new medium where animosity could be freely take backn. kind of than allowing this, lawmakers introduced a law that would handicap the freedom of speech. An internet provider could be punished for, in the words of the Communications Decency Act of 1996   any comment, put across suggestion, proposal, image, or other communication that, in context, depicts or describes, in hurt patently offensive as measurable by present-day(a) union standards, sexual or excretory activities or organs, regardless of whether the user of such(prenominal) service placed the call or initiated the communication or wittingly permits any telecommunications facility under such persons control to be apply for an activity prohibited by paragraph (1) with the intent that it be used for such activity, shall be fined under title 18, United States Code, or captive not more than two years, or both.   There are several(prenominal) flaws in this section of the Communications Decency Act that are due to the vocabulary of the section itself. The entire section patently offensive as measured by contemporary community standards is not defined enough to give a basis for people to be fined or imprisoned. What is offensive to the contemporary community?